The budget is spent
There’s no line item for switching costs or a transition plan. Paying two teams to cover the overlap typically isn’t something you can take to finance.
You’re paying for staff aug that isn’t working, and your budget is committed. We take on defined portions of work in phases, so coverage holds through the switch and legacy vendor budget is released as each portion is accepted.
There’s no line item for switching costs or a transition plan. Paying two teams to cover the overlap typically isn’t something you can take to finance.
The team on its way out has no reason to train the team coming in. Assume the documentation is limited and the knowledge walks with the previous team.
We work with you to identify a defined portion of work. You choose the work that fits how your operation is organized. The switch typically runs in four phases.
Your investment is time and access, not budget. We absorb the cost of assessment so there’s nothing to fund before you’ve seen the plan. Scope and limits are agreed per engagement and written into the SOW.
Match the initial scope to contractor budget you can release.
We shadow your team, then reverse shadow until you accept that we’re ready.
The next shift, service, or channel moves across once we’re ready and the matching legacy vendor budget can be released.
For a 24/7 shift we can take on one shift (for example 8/5), then the entire rotation. We own a set block of hours. When it’s steady, we take the next block, through to full coverage.
We own a single service end to end. Once it runs clean, the next one moves across.
The ticket queue, the support channel, or the pager. Which comes first depends on where your need is greatest.
Every portion we own is a portion you stop buying from the legacy vendor. Coverage grows on one side as it winds down on the other, so the budget moves instead of increasing.
Each step is a portion of work you release from the legacy vendor and we take on.
Illustrative. Step count and pace depend on scope, access, and how fast portions are released. Typically a few months inside a multi-year relationship.
Every transition lands somewhere between two cases, and we’ve run both.
The legacy vendor works the plan. We shadow, then reverse shadow, on the schedule you agreed. Everyone plans for this one; it’s the rarer one.
The day you announce, they go quiet: Slack stops, people get reassigned, documentation turns out thin or missing. We’ve taken over from many vendors that stopped cooperating.
You reallocate budget freed from the legacy vendor. No new funds. Every transition is priced for the work in front of us, not off a rate card.
IT access, background checks if you require them, ticket history, monitoring tools, wikis, docs, and runbooks. Standard access takes one to two days; anything needing a security review typically takes one to three weeks.
Pairing is how knowledge moves. We can’t count on the outgoing team to hand over what they know.
One decides what transfers next. One knows how things actually work.
Notice periods, change-order terms, handback duties, and any clause that lets you reduce scope. Those terms decide what can move and when.
A large enterprise’s search platform, serving multiple internal teams, was staffed through one of the world’s biggest, best-known IT outsourcing firms. It wasn’t delivering. Simple asks, a runbook or a report, came back as someone else’s job and landed on the customer’s senior engineers.
The lesson: even when the legacy vendor walks away, the transition holds. The customer’s engineers still carried onboarding their vendor was paid to do, which is why we say start before you announce.
You’ll know inside the first quarter, and so will we. We hand back the portions we hold; the rest of your coverage is untouched. The real risk of a bad switch is finding out in month nine, not month three.
Bring your current coverage model and the legacy vendor’s contract. We’ll come back with the transition plan and what the first contractor line delivers.
OpsWerks runs 24/7 platform and infrastructure operations as a managed service, not staff augmentation.